Inclusion of freight and insurance charges in the assessable value, CBEC's Circular No.533/29/2000-Cx dated 24.5.2000 regarding Central Excise Valuation.
F.No.6/6/2003-CX.I
Government of India
Ministry of Finance & Company affairs
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Excise & Customs
3rd March, 2003.
37B ORDER No. 59/1/2003-CX
Subject:- Inclusion of freight and insurance charges in the
assessable value.
In exercise of the powers conferred under Section 37B of the Central
Excise Act, 1944, Central Board of Excise and Customs considers it necessary,
for the purpose of uniformity in connection with valuation of excisable goods to
issue the following instructions.
- Attention is invited to CBEC's Circular No.533/29/2000-Cx dated
24.5.2000 regarding Central Excise Valuation - amended definition of 'place
of removal' decision of CEGAT.
- The said Circular had been issued with reference to CEGAT's Order
No.1222/99A dated 24.08.99 in case of M/s.Escorts JCB Limited vs. CCE, New
Delhi. The said judgment of Tribunal was appealed against (CA No.7230/1999)
by the assessee before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Supreme Court have, vide
its Order in Civil Appeal No.7230 of 1999 and C.A.No.1163 of 2000 reported
in 2002(146)ELT31(SC) decided the issue on 24.10.2002 setting aside the
order of Tribunal.
- While giving the judgment the Hon'ble bench of Supreme Court have
observed (in para 13 of the said judgment) that
"in view of the discussions held above in our view the Commissioner of
Central Excise and CEGAT erred in drawing an inference that the ownership in
the property continued to be retained by the assessee till it was delivered
to the buyer for the reason that the assessee had arranged for the transport
and transit insurance. Such a conclusion is not sustainable".
In this judgement Hon'ble Supreme Court also quoted section 39 of 'Sales of
Goods Act, 1930' and held that the machinery, handed over to the carrier/
transporter is as good as delivery to the buyer in term of section 39 of the
Sales of Goods Act, apart from terms and conditions of sale .
- Similarly in Civil Appeal No.4808-4809 of 2000 with C.A.No.1858-1859 of
2001, 7898 of 2001 and 4221 of 2002 against the order of Tribunal in case of
Prabhat Zarda Factory Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise reported
vide 2000(119)ELT191(T-LB), the Hon'ble Supreme Court have in their order
reported vide 2002(146)ELT497(SC) held, on 14.11.2002, that :
"In these matters, the question is whether freight and insurance charges are
to be included in the assessable value for the purposes of excise. This
question is covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Escort JCB
Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi 2002 (146)ELT31(SC). The only
difference which has been pointed out is that in the case of Escorts case
(Supra) the sale was at the factory gate whereas in this case the sale was
from the depot. Learned Counsel for the appellants admit that the freight
and insurance charges upto the Depot would be includible in the assessable
value for the purposes of excise. However, the sale being at the Depot, the
freight and insurance for delivery to the customers from the Depot would not
be so includible as per the said judgment."
- The Central Board of Excise and Customs have in consultation with
Additional Solicitor General, decided not to file review petition against
the said Supreme Court judgements.
- "Assessable value" is to be determined at the "place of removal". Prior
to 1.7.2000, "place of removal" [section 4 (4)(b)-sub clauses (i), (ii) and
(iii)], was the factory gate, warehouse or the depot or any other premises
from where the goods were to be sold. Though the definition of "place of
removal" was amended with effect from 1.7.2000, the point of determination
of the assessable value under section 4 remained substantially the same.
Section 4 (3)(c)(i)[as on 1.7.2000] was identical to the earlier provision
contained in section 4(4)(b)(i), section 4 (3)(c)(ii) was identical to the
earlier provision in section 4(4)(b)(ii) and rule 7 of the Central Excise
Valuation (Determination of Price of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000, took care
of the situation covered by the earlier section 4(4)(b)(iii). In the Finance
Bill, 2003 (clause 128), the definition "place of removal" is proposed to be
restored, through amendment of section 4 to the position as it existed just
prior to 1.7.2000.
- Thus, it would be essential in each case of removal of excisable goods
to determine the point of "sale". As per the above two Apex Court decisions
this will depend on the terms (or conditions of contract) of the sale. The
‘insurance’ of the goods during transit will, however, not be the sole
consideration to decide the ownership or the point of sale of the goods.
- Based on the above clarifications, pending cases may be disposed off.
Past instructions, circulars and orders of the Board on the issue may be
considered as suitably modified.
- Suitable Trade Notice may be issued for the information and guidance of
the trade.
- Receipt of this Order may please be acknowledged.
- Hindi version will follow.
Suraksha Katiyar
Under Secretary to the Govt. of India.
F.No.6/ 6/2003-CX.I
Government of India
Ministry of Finance & Company affairs
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Excise & Customs
3rd March, 2003.
Subject: Central Excise- Forwarding a copy of Section 37 B Order
No. 59/1/2003-CX dated 03/03/2003, regarding inclusion of freight and insurance
charges in the assessable value.
I am directed to forward herewith a copy of Board's Order No. 59/1/2003-CX
dated 03/03/2003 issued under Section 37 B of Central Excise Act, 1944 on the
above mentioned subject for necessary action.
- The receipt of this letter may please be acknowledged.
Suraksha Katiyar
Under Secretary to the Govt. of India