Recovery of tax: EximGuru.com
GST RECOVERY OF TAX
1. Tax administration occasionally comes across situationswhere the tax dues are not paid correctly by the taxpayers, most of the times inadvertently and sometimesdeliberately. To minimise the inadvertent short paymentof taxes, the concept of ‘Matching’ details of ‘Outwardsupplies’ of supplier with the details of ‘Inward supplies’of recipient has been introduced in the GST Act.Moreover, the self-assessed tax has to be paid by thedue date prescribed under the GST Act and in case ofany failure to pay the same by the due date, the InputTax Credit will not be available to customers and also thetax payer will not be able to file any return for furtherperiod. Effectually these provisions work as a self-policingsystem and take care of any mis-match in the payment oftaxes. However, despite these provisions, there may arisesome instances where the tax was not paid correctly. Todeal with such situations, the provisions for recovery areincorporated in any tax law. Accordingly, the GST Actcontains elaborate provisions for the recovery of taxunder various situations, which can be broadly classifiedinto the following two categories:
(i) Tax short paid or erroneously refunded or Input Tax Credit wrongly availed; and
(ii) Non-payment of self-assessed tax or amount collected as representing the Tax.
2. The incidence of short payment of tax or erroneous refund or wrong availment of Input Tax Credit may be because of an inadvertent bonafide mistake (Normal Cases) or it may be a deliberate attempt (Fraud Cases) to evade the tax. Since the nature of offence is totally different in both the incidences, hence, separate provisions for recovery of the tax and the amount of penalty have been made to deal with such type of cases. Besides these, there are provisions to encourage voluntary compliance such as no penalty or lesser penalty if the tax dues along with interest, are paid within the specified time limit/ incidence. The table below gives a comprehensive chart of provisions for voluntary compliance:
| S. No. | Action by Tax Payer | Amount of Penalty payable — Normal Cases | Amount of Penalty payable — Fraud Cases | Remarks |
| 1 | Tax amount, along with the interest, paid before issuance of Notice | No Penalty and no Notice shall be issued | 15% of the Tax amount and no Notice shall be issued | The penalty shall also be not chargeable in cases where the self assessed tax or any amount collected as tax is paid (with interest) within 30 days from the due date of payment |
| 2 | Tax amount, along with the interest, paid within 30 days of issuance of Notice | No Penalty. All proceedings deemed to be concluded | 25% of the Tax amount. All proceedings deemed to be concluded |
| 3 | Tax amount, along with the interest, paid within 30 days of communication of Order | 10% of the Tax amount or Rs. 10,000/-, whichever is higher | 50% of the Tax amount. All proceedings deemed to be concluded |
| 4 | Tax amount, along with the interest, paid after 30 days of communication of Order | 10% of the Tax amount or Rs. 10,000/-, whichever is higher | 100% of the Tax amount |
3. As can be seen from the foregoing para that for all types of incidences of short payment or erroneous refund or wrong availment of Input Tax Credit, there are incentives for the person who accepts tax liability and readily discharges the same. The law provides an opportunity for the payment of tax, interest and a nil or nominal penalty (depending on the nature of offence) before the issuance of Notice and emphatically stipulates that in all such cases no Notice shall be issued and consequently there shall be no other consequences for any default. However, this is not the end of the road and there is another chance to discharge tax and interest liability with nil or nominal penalty (depending on the nature of offence) within 30 days of issuance of the Notice and the law provides that all proceedings in respect of the said Notice shall be deemed to be concluded. If it becomes inevitable to issue a show cause notice and thereafter pass an Order, the GST Act ensures timely completion of all these procedures by providing a fixed timeline for issuance of notice and order-as follows:
| S. No. | Nature of Case | Time for issuance of Notice | Time for issuance of Order |
| 1 | Normal Cases | Within 2 years and 9 months from the due date of filing Annual Return for the Financial Year to which the demand pertains or from the date of erroneous refund | Within 3 years from the due date of filing of Annual Return for the Financial Year to which the demand pertains or from the date of erroneous refund |
| 2 | Fraud Cases | Within 4 years and 6 months from the due date of filing of Annual Return for the Financial Year to which the demand pertains or from the date of erroneous refund | Within 5 years from the due date of filing of Annual Return for the Financial Year to which the demand pertains or from the date of erroneous refund |
| 3 | Any amount collected as tax but not paid | No time limit | Within one year from the date of issue of notice |
| 4 | Nonpayment of selfassessed tax | No need to issue a show cause notice | Recovery proceedings can be started directly |
The GST Act also ensures timely disposal of cases by further providing that if the Order is not issued within the stipulated time limit of three years or five years, as the case may be, the adjudication proceedings shall be deemed to be concluded. From all these provisions it is clear that the non-payment of self-assessed tax or the amount collected as representing the tax has been treated differently than the other short payments and in case of these two, the only opportunity for paying the same without incurring any penalty is, if it is paid, with interest, within 30 days from the due date of payment.
4. All these provisions makes it clear that there are sufficient opportunities to amend and discharge the tax liability with nil or nominal penalties. However, there are disincentives also for the person who fails to utilise these beneficial provisions. Besides that, the law also provides that the Board may fix certain monetary limits for not filing an Appeal against any order. It means, if any order is passed in favour of the assesse, the department will not pursue the case further by filing appeals if the amount involved is less than the specified limit. At present, under the existing laws, the monetary limits for not filing an appeal to various judicial forums are follows:
i. Tribunal- Rs. 10 Lakhs
ii. High Courts- Rs. 15 Lakhs and
iii. Supreme Court- Rs. 25 Lakhs
5. The recovery proceedings are final steps towards the realisation of any tax or amount, which has been confirmed as payable after following the due process of adjudication by the proper officer. Therefore, if the tax dues and other amounts remain unpaid, despite these beneficial provisions, and the tax payer fails to pay the dues after the orders are passed and the statutory limit of 3 months is over, then the proper officer may initiate recovery proceedings. These recovery provisions under the CGST Act, 2017 lay down a well defined procedure which is as follows:
i. Any amount payable, in pursuance to any order passed in this matter, is required to be paid within 3 months from the date of receipt of order and the tax payer should pay the same within this time limit. However, it may be mentioned that in certain cases, considering the interest of revenue, this period of 3 months may be reduced.
ii. If the payable amount is not paid within the specified time limit of 3 months then recovery proceedings shall be initiated and various actions may be taken by the recovery officer, for realisation of Government dues. The options for recovery of Government dues include deduction of money from any amount payable to such tax payer, by detaining and selling any goods, by directing any other person from whom the money is due to such person, attaching any property belonging to the defaulter etc.
iii. However, considering various business aspects, the provisions for payment of all such amounts, other than self-assessed tax, in instalments have also been made in the Act. A person can avail this benefit of payment in instalments, by making an application to the Commissioner by specifying reasons for such request. On receipt of application, the Commissioner may allow the payment of amount in instalments, subject to maximum 24 monthly instalments and on payment of applicable interest. Here it may be noted that if there is default in payment of any one instalment then the whole outstanding balance shall become due and payable immediately